![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The legislation calls 50 percent of online slot gaming revenue to be allocated to the state, 35 percent to the state’s “authorized iGaming platform vendor,” and 15 percent to the state’s “authorized iGaming game vendor.” Larisa argued that for this proposal to be legal, voters would have to approve the expansion in a statewide referendum, and voters in the 37 cities and towns other than Lincoln and Tiverton would have to approve it because it would expand online gaming to every smart phone, tablet, and computer screen in the state. Larisa noted the state Constitution says that “no act expanding the types or locations of gambling” shall take effect until such an expansion is approved in statewide and local referenda. Larisa Jr., a lawyer who had challenged the state’s online sports betting program. The proposal drew immediate opposition from Joseph S. “I was interested because I felt that it was a revenue generator,” Ruggerio said. But he said he asked Bally’s to take a look at the concept and see what they are doing in other states. “I mean, I wouldn’t know iGaming from Adam,” Ruggerio said. He said he wasn’t familiar with the concept at the time. “I was at a gaming conference a few years ago, and someone mentioned iGaming.” I went to them,” Ruggerio said after the Chamber event. When Bally’s announced the proposal in February, Ruggerio said he not only considered it a “great idea” - he said he suggested the concept to Bally’s. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |